<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Run Windows on OS X for free with Sun&#8217;s Virtualbox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzwordcompliant.net/2008/09/30/how-to-run-windows-on-os-x-for-free-with-suns-virtualbox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzwordcompliant.net/2008/09/30/how-to-run-windows-on-os-x-for-free-with-suns-virtualbox/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 19:07:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Buckbee</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzwordcompliant.net/2008/09/30/how-to-run-windows-on-os-x-for-free-with-suns-virtualbox/comment-page-1/#comment-10374</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Buckbee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 14:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzwordcompliant.net/?p=148#comment-10374</guid>
		<description>@Asbjorn - You can definitely still tell you are in a Virtual Machine, the mouse &quot;skitters&quot; a little bit. Responsiveness is just a little slower than you&#039;d find generally acceptable, that sort of thing.

@Fat Bloke - the biggest feature I think VirtualBox is missing is Fusion&#039;s &quot;Coherence&quot; feature where you can designate an application to run as if it were a mac app (not confined to the virtual screen session), also things like setting file types to open in applications in the VM, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Asbjorn &#8211; You can definitely still tell you are in a Virtual Machine, the mouse &#8220;skitters&#8221; a little bit. Responsiveness is just a little slower than you&#8217;d find generally acceptable, that sort of thing.</p>
<p>@Fat Bloke &#8211; the biggest feature I think VirtualBox is missing is Fusion&#8217;s &#8220;Coherence&#8221; feature where you can designate an application to run as if it were a mac app (not confined to the virtual screen session), also things like setting file types to open in applications in the VM, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fat Bloke</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzwordcompliant.net/2008/09/30/how-to-run-windows-on-os-x-for-free-with-suns-virtualbox/comment-page-1/#comment-10373</link>
		<dc:creator>Fat Bloke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzwordcompliant.net/?p=148#comment-10373</guid>
		<description>Out of interest...
What features do you think VirtualBox lacks which VMware and Parallels have?

- FB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Out of interest&#8230;<br />
What features do you think VirtualBox lacks which VMware and Parallels have?</p>
<p>- FB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asbjørn Ulsberg</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzwordcompliant.net/2008/09/30/how-to-run-windows-on-os-x-for-free-with-suns-virtualbox/comment-page-1/#comment-10372</link>
		<dc:creator>Asbjørn Ulsberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 08:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzwordcompliant.net/?p=148#comment-10372</guid>
		<description>Interesting. I&#039;ve bought Parallels 3.0, but as I&#039;m not compeltely satisfied with it, I might give Virtualbox a spin. Do you have any idea how it performs compared to Parallels and VMware Fusion?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. I&#8217;ve bought Parallels 3.0, but as I&#8217;m not compeltely satisfied with it, I might give Virtualbox a spin. Do you have any idea how it performs compared to Parallels and VMware Fusion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

